AI CRM · Autonomous GTM

Clarify

A CRM that asks before it acts, priced by AI work instead of seats — in a cohort where Attio has $116M and HubSpot is closing the AI window in real time.

Altis Ventures · June 2026
1

The AI GTM market splits along two axes — CRM scope vs. end-to-end GTM, structured retrofit vs. AI-native — and Clarify sits in the same architectural quadrant as Day AI

Legacy CRM · Structured + retrofit AI

Salesforce ($38B rev, Agentforce)
HubSpot ($2.6B rev, Breeze AI — 51% of users noticed major AI expansion in last 12 months)

Next-gen CRM · Programmable schema

Attio ($116M total, 5,000+ customers, NPS +29)

AI-native CRM · Unstructured memory

Clarify ($22.5M) — user-confirmed flow
Day AI ($24M Sequoia) — auto-writes without user confirmation
Lightfield (~$81M), Coffee.ai (early)

AI-native end-to-end GTM

Monaco ($85M, flat fee + AE service, Benchmark)
Reevo ($90M, “Revenue OS”, Khosla + Kleiner)

2

Day AI’s structural trust gap creates a user-confirmed opening for Clarify — but $22.5M against $116M Attio and a closing HubSpot AI window is a narrow lane to ship the bundling thesis

Bull
  • Day AI’s structural trust gap is the opening. Day AI scored lowest on data quality of five evaluated CRMs (~70% accuracy on autonomous writes per evaluator interviews); 40% of next-gen CRM users cite data accuracy as a top reason they’d move to a more robust solution as they scale. Clarify’s approve-before-commit flow targets this directly.
  • CDP-pedigree team understands the data layer the AI-CRM thesis depends on. Iteratively→Amplitude; Hay ran $2–3M RevOps stack at Ramp with 15 people. Clean event capture is the binding constraint on agent reliability.[1][5]
  • Credit-based pricing is the only structurally novel pricing model in the AI-CRM cohort. Attio/Reevo per-seat, Day AI per-agent, Monaco flat fee. Snowflake-style expansion flywheel if usage grows with GTM activity.[3]
  • 83% of GTM decision-makers want integrated platforms; vibe coding is not the threat. 9% have built internal CRM tools (GTM decision-maker survey, N=70). The category is durable; the question is which AI-CRM wins.
  • Community-led acquisition via RevTech Essentials is a distribution wedge. No flagship-cohort peer has this mechanic — Attio/Day AI/Monaco/Reevo all sell sales-led or founder-led.[8]
Bear
  • ARR, NRR, ACV, customer count all undisclosed; founders publicly “trying new pricing” — unit economics still being calibrated. Day AI and Attio at least disclose customer counts; Clarify has not.[8]
  • Day AI has Sequoia, Pat Grady, and the deepest CRM founder pedigree. Christopher O’Donnell (former HubSpot CPO who built the only CRM that “meaningfully competed with Salesforce”) materially halves evaluation friction with first-time CRM buyers — Clarify’s exact ICP.
  • Attio ($116M, 5,000+ customers, NPS +29) is winning real HubSpot switches today. 33% of Attio switchers came from HubSpot. Same buyer, six years and ~5x capital ahead of Clarify.
  • HubSpot AI ramp closing the window. 51% of HubSpot users noticed major/significant AI expansion in last 12 months; 53–58% of next-gen CRM switchers would have stayed if HubSpot had comparable AI. Day AI itself runs on HubSpot.
  • Sequences, LinkedIn, Slack, public API all unshipped as of mid-2025 — exactly the modules the bundling thesis needs.[3][9]
  • SaaSpocalypse cuts against narrower CRM scope. Reevo ($90M) and Monaco ($85M) bet broader workflow ownership; Clarify has no offsetting end-to-end GTM story.
3

Contents

01
Company
Founders, funding, product architecture, differentiation
02
Competitive
Landscape, competitive forces, positioning
03
Risks & Signals
Customer signals, what to watch
4
01 — Company

Repeat CDP founders with $22.5M, targeting the CRM data-platform problem that broke them at Amplitude and Ramp

Patrick Thompson — Co-CEO. Co-founded Iteratively (CDP/analytics governance, acquired by Amplitude 2021). Led product at Amplitude.[1]

Austin Hay — Co-CEO. VP Growth at mParticle. Head of MarTech/Ops at Ramp ($2–3M CRM stack, 15-person RevOps team). Hosts RevTech Essentials.[5]

Ondrej Hrebicek — CTO. Three-time founder. Founded Syncplicity (acq. EMC). Co-founded Iteratively. Dir. Engineering at Amplitude.[5]

Series A (Jun 2025): $15M led by USVP + Gradient. Madrona, Recall, Ascend, Essence, New Normal Fund, Fika participating.[2]

$22.5M
Total raised[2]
~24
Team size (Jun 2025)[1]
70%
Weekly pilot engagement[2]
80%
Admin reduction reported[5]

Named customers: Paramark, Sift, Volca. ARR, customer count, NRR undisclosed. Cohort context: smallest capital base in the AI-CRM cohort — Attio $116M / 5,000+ customers, Day AI $24M + Sequoia, Reevo $90M, Monaco $85M.

5
01 — Company

An event-driven CRM that watches email, calendar, and calls — then proposes deal updates the user approves before commit (structurally different from Day AI, which auto-writes records without user confirmation)

  • Core CRM objects (contacts, companies, deals) with a modern UI modeled on Notion/Linear. Command-K search, keyboard shortcuts, fast load times.[3]
  • Ambient automation with user confirmation — watches email, calendar, call activity. Evaluates every incoming event and proposes actions: deal creation, field updates, follow-up drafts. User approves before commit. Day AI’s comparable layer commits autonomously, which drives its data-quality complaints.[3]
  • Waterfall enrichment built in (3–4 providers). No separate Apollo, Clearbit, or ZoomInfo needed. Free for all users.[3]
  • AI Fields — prompt-based mini-agents per field. Use cases: tech stack detection, BANT scoring, competition tracking, product feedback, recent news.[6]
  • Integrated call recorder with local (no-bot) and bot modes. Desktop app floats alongside calls.[3]

“We did over a hundred discovery calls before starting this company, and every team had at least half a dozen tools. At Amplitude, we had thirty-three different tools in our go-to-market stack.”

Patrick Thompson, Co-CEO | Clarify — Live AMA[3]

“At Ramp, we had a team of fifteen folks trying to make it easy for the seller to just show up and have conversations. We were not able to achieve it.”

Austin Hay, Co-CEO | Clarify — Live AMA[3]
6
01 — Company

Credit-based pricing eliminates seat math, but four critical features remain unshipped against the bundling thesis

Pricing model: No seats. Customers buy credits consumed by AI work (deal summaries, meeting prep, enrichment, call recording, follow-ups). Every feature individually enable/disable. Only fully usage-priced CRM in the cohort — Attio per-seat + credit overlay, Day AI per-agent, Monaco flat fee, Reevo per-seat.[3]

FeatureStatusTarget
AI Meeting PrepShipped—
Integrated Call RecorderShipped—
Auto Deal CreationShipped—
AI FieldsShipped—
Workflow Orchestrationv1 shippedIterating
Multi-channel SequencesNot shippedQ3–Q4 2025
LinkedIn IntegrationNot shippedQ3 2025
Slack IntegrationNot shippedQ4 2025
Public API DocsNot shippedQ4 2025

“The tool remains limited: no multi-channel sequences, no advanced automations, and a functional scope that’s still limited compared to market standards.”

Salesdorado — Independent Review, 2026[9]

“We’re trying new pricing, and when you try new pricing, all your assumptions about how you get to your revenue target for the year change.”

Austin Hay, Co-CEO | Clarify — RevTech Essentials[8]

Cost forecasting calculator for credit-based pricing was on the roadmap but not yet available as of mid-2025.

7
02 — Competitive

Clarify is the smallest-capitalized AI-native CRM in a cohort where Attio has $116M and 5,000+ customers, Day AI has Sequoia, and Reevo/Monaco own broader GTM scope

CompanyFunding / ScaleCore Advantage
Salesforce$38B rev (FY2025)Enterprise install base, AppExchange, Agentforce
HubSpot$2.6B rev (FY2024)SMB dominance, 1,500+ integrations, Breeze AI — 51% of users notice major AI expansion in 12 months
Attio$116M total (Series B $52M Aug 2025, General Catalyst)Programmable data model, embedded AI, MCP server, 5,000+ customers, NPS +29, real HubSpot switches
Day AI$24M total ($20M Series A Feb 2026, Sequoia)Customer-memory architecture, deepest CRM founder pedigree (O’Donnell ex-HubSpot CPO)
Monaco$85M total (Series A 2026 Benchmark-led)Software + human-in-the-loop AE, flat fee, “Sam-as-a-service”
Reevo$90M total (Series A Nov 2025 Khosla + Kleiner)Integrated “Revenue OS”, conversational intelligence at 80–90% of Gong
Lightfield~$81M, ~$300M valuationAI-native CRM, viral onboarding (5-min auto-populate)
Rox AI$50M+ raisedWarehouse-native, agentic CRM, agent swarms
Folk / Coffee.aiVariousVisual pipeline / lightweight / autonomous claims
8
02 — Competitive

HubSpot’s AI ramp is closing the window; Day AI has Sequoia and deeper pedigree but a structural trust gap; Reevo and Monaco own broader scope — Clarify’s narrow opening is user-confirmed AI at credit-metered pricing

  • HubSpot AI ramp closing the window: 51% of HubSpot users notice major/significant AI expansion in 12 months; 53–58% of next-gen CRM switchers would have stayed if HubSpot had had comparable AI. Day AI itself runs on HubSpot — legacy substrate is absorbing AI-native capabilities.
  • Day AI — closest peer, deeper pedigree, structural trust gap: O’Donnell + Pici ex-HubSpot CPO/VP Product is real distribution moat. But Day AI scored lowest on data quality of five evaluated CRMs and reports ~70% accuracy on autonomous writes — Clarify’s approve-before-commit flow targets exactly this opening.[11] A daily Day AI power user clocked its autonomous writes at ~70% accuracy, then paused automation and reverted to suggest-then-approve — exactly Clarify’s default (industry expert interview, May 2026).
  • Attio is winning HubSpot switches today: $116M, 5,000+ customers, NPS +29. 33% of Attio switchers came from HubSpot, 47% from Salesforce. Six years and ~5x capital ahead of Clarify, same buyer.
  • Reevo / Monaco own broader scope: 83% of GTM buyers want consolidation onto a single platform. Reevo ($90M) + Monaco ($85M) capture that demand at end-to-end GTM scope; Clarify is at CRM scope with no workflow-ownership offset. SaaSpocalypse risk falls heavier on narrower scope.
  • Integration moat erosion cuts both ways: Hay argues moat “completely disappears in 1–2 years.” Weakens incumbent lock-in (helps Clarify switching pitch) but also blocks Clarify from building one (hurts durability).[3]
  • Bundling breadth vs. point-solution depth: Gong, Apollo, Outreach have years of specialized ML and UX. Reevo customers report enrichment quality at 30–40% of Apollo — the “80–90% on everything, 100% on nothing” warning applies to any bundler at this stage.

“The integration moat is going to completely disappear in the next one to two years. What happens when you can talk to the CRM and say, ‘Can you write the webhook from point A to point B?’”

Austin Hay, Co-CEO | Clarify — Live AMA[3]

“It’s been our biggest gripe with Day that we can’t trust its numbers.”

RevOps Lead, early-stage Day AI customer — industry expert interview, May 2026

“At Amplitude, we had thirty-three different tools in our go-to-market stack. Even early-stage startups have a tool for support, outbound, CRM, call recording.”

Patrick Thompson, Co-CEO | Clarify — Live AMA[3]
9
03 — Risks & Signals

Whether Clarify ships sequences/LinkedIn before the HubSpot AI window closes — and whether the user-confirmation architecture wins head-to-head against Day AI on the trust-gap dimension — are the load-bearing signals that determine if $22.5M was the right bet

  • Sequences + LinkedIn shipped by Q3 2026 — targeted Q3–Q4 2025 originally. Further slippage signals product-bandwidth constraints that compound as HubSpot AI absorbs switching demand and Reevo/Monaco capture the integrated-platform wallet.[3]
  • First ARR / growth metric disclosure — expected H1–H2 2026. Triple-digit growth with NRR above 110% and named logos above 50 employees confirms the thesis. Flat metrics with pricing revision breaks it.
  • 12-month NRR from June 2025 GA cohort — observable ~June 2026. Whether credit consumption expands (Snowflake) or flatlines (failed seat-replacement) reveals if the structurally novel pricing model is working.[2]
  • Head-to-head wins vs. Day AI in published customer references — the strategic opening is the trust gap. Observable when customers cite “we tried Day AI and it hallucinated” as the buy reason; if Clarify never wins those swap-outs, the user-confirmation differentiation is not load-bearing.
  • Customer retention through first VP of Sales hire — graduation churn is the universal AI-CRM ceiling. Does Clarify keep customers past 15 sellers, where Day AI customers explicitly say “team of 12, I’m probably buying HubSpot”?
  • Credit pricing stability — revision or seat-tier reintroduction signals the only structurally novel pricing model in the cohort isn’t working at scale.[8]
10

Sources

Methodology

Clarify-specific public videos: 4 transcripts (~120 min total). 3 founder-produced (Live AMA, AI Fields demo, Introducing Clarify), 1 educational webinar (RevTech Essentials Module 3).

Web research: GeekWire, WebWire, Madrona, Essence VC, Ascend.vc, Salesdorado, CRM Switch.

Sector ground truth: Altis primary sector research on AI-CRM and AI-GTM categories (37 evaluator interviews, N=70 GTM decision-maker survey, May 2026). Used for cohort funding numbers, Day AI data-quality finding, HubSpot AI ramp metric, integrated-platform demand, vibe-coding-non-threat finding.

References

      11

      Legal Notices

      1. Informational Purposes Only. This report has been prepared by Altis Ventures, Inc. (“Altis”) solely for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation to buy or sell any security.

      2. Not an Offer. Nothing herein constitutes an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or investment product.

      3. No Guarantee of Accuracy. Information is derived from sources believed to be reliable, but Altis makes no representation or warranty as to accuracy, completeness, or timeliness.

      4. Third-Party Sources. This report relies on publicly available data, company-provided materials, and third-party research. Altis has not independently verified all such information.

      5. Risk Acknowledgment. Investing in early-stage companies involves substantial risk, including the possible loss of principal.

      6. Forward-Looking Statements. Views expressed are those of Altis as of the date indicated and are subject to change.

      7. No Duty to Update. 8. No Redistribution. 9. No Fiduciary Relationship.

      10. Conflicts and Interests. Altis may have relationships with entities referenced in this report.

      11. Warranty Disclaimer. THE REPORT IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS.

      12. Limitation of Liability. Altis’s aggregate liability shall not exceed $100.

      12

      Thank you

      13